Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add LightningDataModule.load_from_checkpoint to load datamodules directly from checkpoint #12550

Merged
merged 12 commits into from
May 3, 2022

Conversation

rohitgr7
Copy link
Contributor

@rohitgr7 rohitgr7 commented Mar 31, 2022

What does this PR do?

Fixes #12062

Does your PR introduce any breaking changes? If yes, please list them.

Before submitting

  • Was this discussed/approved via a GitHub issue? (not for typos and docs)
  • Did you read the contributor guideline, Pull Request section?
  • Did you make sure your PR does only one thing, instead of bundling different changes together?
  • Did you make sure to update the documentation with your changes? (if necessary)
  • Did you write any new necessary tests? (not for typos and docs)
  • Did you verify new and existing tests pass locally with your changes?
  • Did you list all the breaking changes introduced by this pull request?
  • Did you update the CHANGELOG? (not for typos, docs, test updates, or internal minor changes/refactorings)

PR review

Anyone in the community is welcome to review the PR.
Before you start reviewing make sure you have read Review guidelines. In short, see the following bullet-list:

  • Is this pull request ready for review? (if not, please submit in draft mode)
  • Check that all items from Before submitting are resolved
  • Make sure the title is self-explanatory and the description concisely explains the PR
  • Add labels and milestones (and optionally projects) to the PR so it can be classified

Did you have fun?

Make sure you had fun coding 🙃

cc @carmocca @awaelchli @Borda @ananthsub @ninginthecloud @jjenniferdai @rohitgr7

@rohitgr7 rohitgr7 added argparse (removed) Related to argument parsing (argparse, Hydra, ...) lightningdatamodule pl.LightningDataModule labels Mar 31, 2022
@rohitgr7 rohitgr7 added this to the 1.7 milestone Mar 31, 2022
@rohitgr7 rohitgr7 changed the title Add LightningDataModule.load_from_checkpoint to load datamodules directly from checkpoint Add LightningDataModule.load_from_checkpoint to load datamodules directly from checkpoint Mar 31, 2022
@rohitgr7 rohitgr7 marked this pull request as ready for review April 1, 2022 07:55
CHANGELOG.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pytorch_lightning/core/datamodule.py Show resolved Hide resolved
pytorch_lightning/core/saving.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pytorch_lightning/core/saving.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pytorch_lightning/core/saving.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pytorch_lightning/core/saving.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pytorch_lightning/core/saving.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
rohitgr7 and others added 4 commits April 4, 2022 18:24
Co-authored-by: Carlos Mocholí <carlossmocholi@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Carlos Mocholí <carlossmocholi@gmail.com>
@mergify mergify bot removed the has conflicts label Apr 26, 2022
@mergify mergify bot added the ready PRs ready to be merged label Apr 26, 2022
@otaj otaj enabled auto-merge (squash) April 28, 2022 14:14
Copy link
Contributor

@awaelchli awaelchli left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is a nice feature addition!

I have one concern question where I believe we should look for a decision before merging the PR.
In #10375 I propose to deprecate support for saving and restoring from a singular hparams container passed as input argument. If we decide to do this deprecation in this release, it would be better if the implementation here would already adopt the new restricted (simpler) way of parsing the args. If you think this is less convenient, then I'm also good with this. I just want to avoid us introducing a new feature with a broader scope and immediately deprecate partial functionality.

cc @carmocca

docs/source/common/checkpointing_basic.rst Show resolved Hide resolved
@rohitgr7
Copy link
Contributor Author

rohitgr7 commented May 2, 2022

This is a nice feature addition!

I have one concern question where I believe we should look for a decision before merging the PR. In #10375 I propose to deprecate support for saving and restoring from a singular hparams container passed as input argument. If we decide to do this deprecation in this release, it would be better if the implementation here would already adopt the new restricted (simpler) way of parsing the args. If you think this is less convenient, then I'm also good with this. I just want to avoid us introducing a new feature with a broader scope and immediately deprecate partial functionality.

cc @carmocca

let's do it in this release in a follow-up. I have seen similar issues related to it on slack so would be worth restricting the containers here.

@rohitgr7 rohitgr7 requested a review from awaelchli May 2, 2022 15:26
Copy link
Member

@Borda Borda left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

Copy link
Member

@Borda Borda left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

.

@otaj otaj merged commit cd01856 into master May 3, 2022
@otaj otaj deleted the feat/dm_load_from_checkpoint branch May 3, 2022 12:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
argparse (removed) Related to argument parsing (argparse, Hydra, ...) lightningdatamodule pl.LightningDataModule ready PRs ready to be merged
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Datamodule's hparams should be saved inside checkpoint
6 participants